Performing Labor Contracts in the Period of Covid-19 Epidemic

The Covid-19 epidemic has seriously affected the development of the economy and society. The situation of businesses being spacing as well as suspension of production and service provision happens regularly in epidemic-affected localities, and that also seriously affects the life stability of employees. Because most enterprises’ financial situations get worse, so the businesses seem like they cannot guarantee income for employees. This is a force majeure and legal event, and the labor law has specific provisions to balance and ensure the interests of employees but also make the best support to enterprises.

 

Performing Labor Contracts in the Period of Covid – 19 Epidemic

Specifically, according to the provisions of Clause 3, Article 99 of the Labor Code 2019, specific instructions are provided in Official Dispatch No. 264/QHLĐTL-TL of Ministry of Labor – Invalids and Social affairs  about paying salary (known as “ stoppage salary”) for employees during the shutdown period related to the Covid-19 epidemic on July 15, 2021; direct instructions for businesses and employees during the epidemic period, in case of having to suspend work due to an incident that is not the fault of the employer such as a dangerous disease, the employee and the employer agree on the salary according to the following regulations.

In case of having to suspend work for less than 14 working days, the agreed stoppage salary shall not be lower than the minimum wage.

In case of having to suspend work for more than 14 working days, the stoppage salary shall be agreed upon by both parties but must ensure that that salary in the first 14 days is not lower than the minimum wage.

Accordingly, the labor relationship is a civil relationship as well as ensuring the agreement between the parties, however, it is also necessary to pay attention to ensuring the life quality  of the employee, thus stipulating the case of having to suspend work from under 14 days that the parties have the right to agree on a salary which is ensured not lower than the minimum wage; besides, in case of suspension for more than 14 days, this is undesirable in the labor relationship as the damage for the employee is not allowed to work as well as does not guarantee income, and this also for the employer that they are not able to guarantee the output of goods and services provided to the partner, as well as the normal operation of the business, etc. Therefore, the law allows the parties to agree on the stoppage salary in this case.

The epidemic is a force majeure. In the case of having to suspend work for too long as it is unable to judge the progress of the epidemic, to ensure the financial ability of the employer as well as the health and safety of employees, the parties may agree to suspend performing labor contract. The content specified at point h, Clause 1, Article 30 of the Labor Code 2019, allows the parties to agree to suspend the labor contract, therefore we can realize this is also an appropriate regulation in the current epidemic period. Currently, when suspended in performing a labor contract, the employee is not entitled to salary and other rights and benefits as agreed in the labor contract. However, the employee and the employer may have another agreement on employee benefits.

According to Article 31 of the Labor Code 2019, within 15 days after ending the suspension period of the labor contract, the employee must be present at the workplace as well as the employer must accept the employee’s return to resume work under the signed labor contract in case of the valid labor contract, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Accordingly, the employee and the employer must fully agree on the contents related to the suspension of the labor contract, to avoid issues and disputes arising after ending the suspension period of the performing labor contract.

In addition, Point c, Clause 1, Article 36 of the Labor Law 2019 stipulates that the employer has the right to unilaterally terminate a labor contract in case of natural disaster, fire, dangerous epidemic, enemy sabotage or migration, relocation, or downsizing of production and business under the request of the competent state agency, and the employer has sought all remedies but can’t help reducing personnel. Therefore, in the situation of dangerous epidemics, termination of the labor contract with termination grounds is considered a non – illegal act of unilaterally terminating the labor contract.

However, the grounds for termination because of the dangerous epidemic that the employer has tried all measures to overcome but can’t help reducing the personnel are only necessary conditions that the employer needs to comply with, besides, Employers need to comply with the procedure for unilateral termination of labor contracts in terms of the notice period, as well as done allowances to employees when unilaterally terminating labor contracts according to regulations in law.

ANT Lawyers – A labour dispute law firm in Vietnam with international standard, local expertise and strong international network. We focus on customers’ needs and provide clients with a high quality legal advice and services. For advice or services request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529.      

Read More

How ro Resolve Disputes in Employment in Vietnam?

A labor dispute is a dispute over rights, obligations and interests arising between parties in employment relationship. Labor disputes include individual labor disputes between employees and employers, and collective labor disputes between labor collectives and employers. When a labor dispute occurs, the competent agency, organization or individual will settle it on the basis of the measures and principles of labor dispute settlement prescribed in Chapter XIV of the Labor Code 2012.

Employment Dispute Law Firm in Vietnam

Measures for resolving labor disputes include: negotiation, grassroots conciliation, settlement of individuals and organizations competent to settle labor disputes.

For individual labor dispute resolution, labor conciliator, People’s Court is an individual or organization competent to resolve disputes. Labor conciliator; Chairman of the district People’s Committee; The People’s Court is competent to resolve collective labor disputes over labor rights and conciliators; The Labor Arbitration Council is competent to settle collective labor disputes about benefits.

Negotiation is a method of resolving a dispute in which the parties to a dispute deal directly with each other in order to reach an agreement on the settlement of the dispute. In fact, this is the most widely used solution. During the negotiation process, the parties will discuss issues related to the dispute, and propose solutions to resolve that dispute. The decision is made on the basis of agreement between the parties themselves and is not the result of any external pressure.

Unlike negotiation, conciliation is a method of resolving disputes involving third parties but not third parties make decisions but only support and guide the parties to negotiate. Under the provisions of Clause 1, Article 201 of the Labor Code 2012, individual labor disputes must go through the conciliation procedure of a labor conciliator before requesting a court to settle them, except for labor disputes on disciplinary measures in the form of dismissal or disputes over the unilateral termination of the labor contract; compensation for damages, benefits when terminating a labor contract; between domestic servants and employers; on social insurance in accordance with the law on social insurance, on health insurance in accordance with the law on health insurance; on compensation for damages between laborers and enterprises and non-business units that send laborers to work abroad under contracts. If the two parties reach an agreement, the labor conciliator shall make a record of successful conciliation. On the contrary, the two parties cannot reach an agreement, and the labor conciliator issues a conciliation plan for the two parties to consider and if the two parties accept the conciliation plan, the labor conciliator shall make a record of successful conciliation. In case the two parties do not accept the conciliation plan or a disputing party has been duly summoned for the second time but still absent without plausible reasons, the labor conciliator shall make a record of unsuccessful conciliation.

Dispute resolution by the Chairman of the district People’s Committee is the method to be applied when there is a request for resolving a collective labor dispute on rights. Chairpersons of district-level People’s Committees shall base themselves on labor laws, collective labor agreements, registered labor rules and legal regulations and agreements to consider and settle labor disputes dynamic.

The Labor Arbitration Council is the competent authority to settle collective labor disputes about benefits. At the meeting of the Labor Arbitration Council, there must be representatives of both parties to the dispute. The Labor Arbitration Council has the responsibility to assist the parties in self-negotiation. In case the two parties reach an agreement or accept the mediation plan, the Labor Arbitration Council shall make a record of successful mediation and issue a decision recognizing the agreement of the parties. In case the two parties fail to reach an agreement or one of the disputing parties has been duly summoned for the second time but still absent without plausible reasons, the Labor Arbitration Council shall make a record of unsuccessful mediation and after within 03 days, the labor collective has the right to carry out the procedures to go on strike.

Trial is a mode of resolving individual labor disputes and collective labor disputes over rights, in which the Court will issue a judgment or decision to resolve the case. The settlement of labor disputes in court is generally the final settlement activity after the dispute has been settled at other stages with no results. The settlement of labor disputes at the Court is done by a judicial body with special state power, proceeding according to the strict procedures and procedures prescribed in the Civil Procedure Code 2015. The greatest advantage of this method of dispute resolution is that the court’s decisions on labor disputes are guaranteed to be enforced by state coercive measures.

Employees as well as the labor collective and employers should pay attention to selecting the most appropriate and optimal resolution solution when labor disputes occur.  It is also suggested to consult with labour lawyers of law firm in Vietnam speacializing in employment matters for efficiency.

       

Read More